Archive for the ‘Obesity’ Category

Physical Education Power to the Grid

Tuesday, June 22nd, 2010

An innovative school is having their students exercise on spinning bikes that add electricity to the power grid.

Not only can the students convert their energy into electricity, Nemec said, but this effort also reinforces first lady Michelle Obama’s Let’s Move campaign to combat obesity.

Read the article here.

The students study energy sources, like wind power and clean versus dirty power, and the muscles used to exercise. They use math to graph their miles and the watts they’re generating.

The above quote from the article is very interesting.  If the students are using math to graph their miles and watts, it seems that this is also an excellent opportunity to teach the principle of progressive overload.  Since physical education is often taught outdoors, it is difficult to measure exercise intensity.  Since these bikes measure the students’ power output, teaching students how to provide a stimulus through progressive overload is key.  The mathematics, while stressed in this article, is really only the vehicle to allow students to access this important concept.

The Importance of Content Knowledge

Sunday, September 13th, 2009

By John Kruse

My last post was a discussion about the economic cost of obesity and overweight in this country. Essentially, I was pointing out that obesity is going to continue to be a major obstacle no matter what we do in an effort to save money in this country with health care reform.

I was excited when a friend posted the article on her Facebook wall. That is until I was accused of fashionably blaming fat people. Needless to say, I felt compelled to defend myself and pointed out that I was trying to prevent obesity in the first place. After all, I had written that education is the only way to prevent obesity.

I was shocked when this same person asked where the proof is that obesity causes the diseases that I had listed as being associated with obesity (diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease etc). I was shocked because I was under the impression that pretty much every adult who at least watches some television would know that obesity causes disease. I told her that the evidence is overwhelming and that the medical community would consider it common knowledge. She persisted and stated that associated doesn’t mean cause. And essentially brought up the whole statistics thing about correlation not meaning causation. This statistical argument is sometimes a good one and I like to use it myself.

In an attempt to convince this critic, I felt like I should send her an article that discussed the diseases. I was careful to choose one with peer-reviewed references. Amazingly, she persisted.

Finally, I realized that I hadn’t really thought about the underlying cause in a while. The more I thought about it, the more I realized that this is information that I just take for granted. I really struggled to come up with a really good answer from the top of my head. Consequently, I consulted a few text books and found that most of them just glossed over the topic and didn’t really explain how obesity and overweight cause these diseases. Even my biochemistry book glossed over the topic.

This is why content knowledge is so very important and I was reminded of a few colleagues who always remind me that content knowledge is the number one predictor of teacher effectiveness. Don’t we always have that pesky student who keeps asking those questions that push us into the cobwebs of something we learned long ago? Or even worse, into something we never learned? In this case, it was an adult. As an educator, I felt like I owed her an answer. Not only did I owe her an answer, I began to feel like I had to save face for our profession. Physical educators often times get characterized as dumb jocks and I was determined to not let this be the case in a public forum like Facebook.

Eventually, I found the answer I was looking for and I really hope you’ve made it this far. I’m about to give you the content knowledge to answer this question and I hope you find it useful someday. We owe it to our students and we owe it to our profession.

Weight loss is generally accompanied by an improvement in blood lipid and lipoprotein profile and an increase in the sensitivity of peripheral tissues (muscle, adipose, and liver) to action of insulin. On the other hand, a gain in body weight may result in an increase in total serum cholesterol and LDL cholesterol, an elevation in triglycerides, and a decrease in HDL cholesterol. An increase in body weight is also followed by a progressive deterioration of the response of peripheral tissues to insulin, which leads to an increase in insulin secretion by the pancreas, hyperinsulinemia, and a series of other metabolic events (Sasaki et al. 1987; Gutin and Owens 1999).

Growth, Maturation, and Physical Activity by Malin, Bouchard & Bar-Or

So as you can see, obesity and overweight does influence our health. It does have something to do with our good and bad cholesterol. We know that cholesterol is part of the cardiovascular health equation. We also see that weight gain influences insulin. As we know, insulin is part of the diabetes equation. Case solved!

I really hope I’ve convinced you of the importance of content knowledge. Always keep reading and always keep adding to your personal library. As I stated before, we owe it to our students and to our profession.

Obama’s Address to Congress–A Physical Educator’s Perspective

Wednesday, September 9th, 2009

By John Kruse

I watched President Obama’s health care reform address to Congress tonight.  While Obama gives a good speech, I was disheartened by the fact that Mr. Obama seems intent on saving money, however, the only prevention that was mentioned was mammograms and colonoscopies.

Obama stated in his plan, “insurance companies will be required to cover, with no extra charge, routine checkups and preventive care, like mammograms and colonoscopies — because there’s no reason we shouldn’t be catching diseases like breast cancer and colon cancer before they get worse. That makes sense, it saves money, and it saves lives.”  Instead, why not require the measurement of body mass index? Its a heck of a lot less invasive and certainly cheaper.  In fact, we know that a person at the 85 percentile or higher is at risk of cardiovascular disease.

Obama also stated that, “…our health care system is placing an unsustainable burden on taxpayers.”   Is it really our system?  The CDC reports that the economic cost of obesity and overweight nationally is $147 billion annually.  Obesity and overweight contributes to risk for a number of chronic diseases, including diabetes, cardiovascular disease, some cancers and orthopedic problems.  The only way to prevent obesity is through education.  I saw Secretary of Education, Arne Duncan, in the audience.  Hasn’t Mr. Duncan given any input?  After-all, Mr. Duncan is a fit looking former basketball player whose wife is a former physical educator.  Why wasn’t education mentioned in Obama’s plan?  We need to hear the president talking about health-related fitness–not colonoscopies.  $147 billion annually seems like a lot of money.  In fact, Obama says his plan is only going to cost $900 billion over ten years.  Something doesn’t add up.

Obama also stated that his plan, “will provide insurance to those who don’t (have it).”  Does anyone else find this troubling?  Doesn’t this send the message that a person can gain as much weight as they want, smoke, eat poorly and sit on the couch and the government will still give this person health insurance? It seems to me that fear of not getting health insurance due to poor health should provide at least some incentive to take care of oneself.

The president elaborated, “It’s a plan that asks everyone to take responsibility for meeting this challenge — not just government and insurance companies, but employers and individuals.”  If that’s the case, why not ask the individual to be responsible for their health?  Perhaps a big part of the reason why insurance premiums have gone up three times faster than wages is due to the fact that in the United States, obesity prevalence doubled among adults between 1980 and 2004.

Obama is severley mistaken if he thinks he’s going to save this country from it woes by fixing health care.  Obesity and overweight has a strangle hold on the health of this nation.  What we really need is physical education reform. Lets lighten up the emphasis on testing in the core academic subjects and put an emphasis on physical education again.  Physical education is not an academic issue, its a health issue.

More on Health and Reform

Wednesday, September 9th, 2009

By John Kruse

I’ve written a fair amount lately about how futile any health care reform will be if we don’t fix the obesity epedimic in this country. Today, I came across yet another person who shares this belief.  Colin Horgan in an article titled “Health Care and Education: Let’s Get Physical” writes:

The fact of that matter is that if any kind of reform of the US health system is to be successful, it will rely on this generation being healthier than the last. The Boomers and Gen X’ers will apply untold pressure on any kind of health system, no matter how good it is, and having a fatter, sicker generation follow isn’t going to help anybody, no matter where they land on the political spectrum.

Horgan also points out a number of statistics on obesity that aren’t likely to surprise the readers of this blog.  Lets hope that politicians in Washington wake up to the fact its time to reform America’s waistlines.  Doing so will require education.   America’s physical educators are more important than ever.